NEWS
YOU CAN USE
Ephedra-Free
Weight Loss Supplements Still Pose Risks
SAN FRANCISCO, Sept. 12, 2005 — Ephedra-free
weight loss dietary supplements may pose some of the same cardiovascular
risks that caused ephedra-containing products to be banned, researchers
here said. The substance that has replaced ephedra in these products—bitter
orange extract—appears to increase heart rate and also raise
blood pressure when combined with other stimulants, said Christine
A.
Haller, M.D., and colleagues at the University of California San
Francisco in the September issue of the American Journal of Medicine.
The primary constituents of bitter orange extract are synephrine
and octopamine, which are structurally similar to norepinephrine.
In pharmaceutical form, synephrine is used to treat low blood
pressure and nasal congestion, the investigators said.
The study tested single doses of these supplements in 10 healthy,
non-smoking adults. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded
before dosing and at regular hourly intervals afterward.
Advantra Z, which contains the higher amount of synephrine, did
not raise blood pressure. However, Xenadrine EFX, which contains
other stimulants, increased systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The
researchers suggested that although synephrine does not appear to increase
blood pressure on its own, it may boost the pressure-raising
effects of other stimulants such as caffeine.
Further study is needed to determine the long-term effect of these
products, the researchers said. "Until such data are available,
physicians should caution patients about the use of ephedra-free
weight-loss dietary supplements, and monitor blood pressure in
those who choose to use these supplements," the
researchers said. "Individuals with hypertension, heart disease,
or other pre-existing conditions that could be exacerbated by the
sympathomimetic effects
of botanical stimulants should avoid use of these products," they
advised.
Bottled
Water May Promote Tooth Decay
TORONTO, Sept. 19, 2005 — Tooth decay is making a comeback,
fueled by junk food, spurred by social changes, and abetted by an unusual
culprit—bottled
water. "I had a three-year-old kid come in the other
day," says
Toronto dentist Sheldon Rose, D.D.S., "and he had at least two
cavities that I could see. I haven't seen that for years." Like
most dentists, Dr. Rose blames the usual suspects—snack
foods, soft drinks, lack of parental supervision of food. But bottled
water
also plays a role, he and others suspect. "It's not the water
that's causing the decay," said Jack Cottrell,
D.D.S., president of the Canadian Dental Association (CDA). "It's
the lack of fluoride."
The bottled water issue was raised at the
World Dental Congress in Montreal, Dr. Cottrell said, as part of a
general discussion about
what to do about the sudden rise in tooth decay in children.
The American Dental Association says that more and more "health-conscious
consumers are sipping bottled water." Indeed, says the
International Bottled Water Association, in 2004 Americans drank nearly
6.8 billion gallons, for a per capita consumption level
of 23.8 gallons. That's an 8.6% increase over the previous year, the
association says.
The problem is that people are turning away from tap water—which
for over two-thirds of Americans contains all of the fluoride that
they need to prevent tooth decay—and most bottled waters don't
have enough fluoride.
"If bottled water is your main source of drinking water, you
could be missing the decay-preventive benefits of fluoride," the
ADA says.
(The bottled water association notes that more than 20 U.S. companies
do produce fluoridated products. The association has more than 80
bottlers among its members.)
Part of the rise in bottled water is lack of trust in municipal water.
In Canada in 2000, for instance, a mismanaged town water system in
Walkerton, Ontario, was blamed for killing seven people and making
2,000 others
ill.
One result of such occurrences is that people think tap water is "not
safe," Dr. Cottrell said, and begin drinking and cooking with
bottled water, with detrimental outcomes for their kids' teeth.
Ground zero for fluoridation was the city of Grand Rapids, Michigan,
which 60 years ago began adding small amounts of fluoride to city water
— enough to bring the level to the U.S. Public Health Service recommended
level of between 0.7 and 1.2 parts per million.
Since then, fluoridation has become recognized as a key intervention.
The CDC in December 1999 put fluoridation among the top 10 public
health achievements of the 20th Century, along with such things as
vaccination
and control of infectious diseases.
The Task Force on Community Preventive Services, an independent group
appointed by the CDC director, found that in studies that measured
decay rates before and after water fluoridation, the median decrease
in tooth decay among children ages four to 17 years was 29.1%.
"We know the effectiveness of fluoride," says the CDA's
Dr. Cottrell.
But the chemical is only part of the equation, he adds. "We're
seeing changes in the diets of children," says Dr. Cottrell, a
combination of more readily available sugary snacks and—because
more families are working couples—less parental supervision
of the kids'
diets.
At the same time, he said, the protective element of fluoride is being
removed as more parents switch their kids to bottled water and fruit
juices. "We're not getting the advantages of it," he said. "When I graduated in 1965," said Dr. Rose, "it was a
rarity to see a kid with no decay." Then Toronto's municipal
water supply was fluoridated and the rate of cavities plummeted. "It
became very unusual to see a kid with any decay," Dr. Rose says. "But
in the past 10 years," he says, "it seems we're
going back to the way it used to be."
Even
One Cigarette a Day Jeopardizes Health
OSLO, Norway, Sept. 21, 2005 -- One to four cigarettes per
day, generally considered light smoking, nearly triples the risk
of heart disease and lung cancer, researchers here reported.
Even one cigarette a day is enough to put a smoker's health in jeopardy,
Kjell Bjartveit, M.D. of the National Health Screening
Service and colleagues
reported in the September issue of Tobacco Control.
The study tracked the health and death rates of nearly 43,000 men
and women from the mid 1970s through 2002. At the start of the study,
participants were between 35 and 49 and were screened for cardiovascular
disease and diabetes.
Health information and smoking status were obtained via questionnaire
and clinical exam at the beginning of the study. Light smoking was
defined as one to four cigarettes per day. Primary outcomes were
relative risks of dying, compared with non-smokers, from ischemic
heart disease, lung cancer, and all causes after adjusting for age,
blood pressure, cholesterol, triglyceride levels, physical activity,
body mass index, and height.
Light smokers were nearly three times more likely to die from heart
disease.
"The results from this and other studies imply that smoking control
policy makers and health educators should emphasize more strongly
that light smokers are also endangering their health," the researchers
concluded.